Rajkotupdates.news : RRR Filed PIL in Telangana High Court Before Release : A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in Telangana High Court against SS Rajamouli’s forthcoming magnum opus “RRR,” featuring Jr NTR and Ram Charan. According to the petitioner the film obfuscates information related to Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bhheem.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed
An PIL (public interest litigation) may be filed by any member of the public – be they an ordinary man, an NGO or social activist to seek redress for harm due to violations of legal rights. It’s a way to ensure that the public is involved in the review of judicial administrative decisions.
The Supreme Court has established guidelines to handle and dispose of PILs. It is crucial for the court to guarantee petitioners are acting with the best intentions, and not seeking redress of private or personal gain.
Furthermore, PILs help safeguard the courts from being used by pressure groups to delay legitimate administrative decisions or to advance their political objectives. A misuse of PILs is very common and often leads to delays or even the quashing of genuine cases.
In 2010 the Supreme Court imposed strict guidelines for courts in the case of personal interest liens (PILs). It has long been believed that individuals file frivolous lawsuits in order to get public attention, and impose a huge burden on our judiciary.
Public interest lawsuits may be filed in anyone High Court or Supreme Court by groups, individuals or institutions in order to resolve complaints and infringements of rights. These include the non-payment of wages, bonded labour issues, women’s rights, environmental pollution, and many more.
Indian court is currently hearing various PILs (PILs) to safeguard the rights of various rights and. They cover remedies for child abuse, woman’s protection rights cultural heritage preservation conservation, ecological balance maintenance and many more.
Recently recently, it was reported that the Supreme Court has been hearing several Public Interest Litigations (PILs). One of the cases was brought by a student from West Godavari district who challenged the movie ‘RRR’ because of its distortion of freedom fighters Alluri Seetharama Komaram Bheem and Raju’s lives as British Police officers. To block its release they’ve requested the court to refuse censor certificate issued by the Censor Board and hold off the screening of the film until the next time.
Hearing date
Alluri Sowmya from Undrajavaram in West Godavari filed a Public Interest Liability (PIL) against the movie Sitarama Raju: she claimed that the movie depicted him in the role of a police officer which was in contradiction to their way of life and hurt thousands of their followers’ feelings. So, she asked the court to stay RRR’s release, and that no the censorship certificate be granted to the film, as per rajkotupdates.news : rrr filed pil with the telangana high court before release
The court heard the case on Tuesday. A bench of two justices consisting of Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma along with Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavali dismissed the PIL. They said that nothing can affect the reputations of renowned people like Alluri Sitarama Raju and Konar Ramaraju “Poison may kill Socrates but not his ideas or literature,” they said.
In addition, the judges advised the makers to take appropriate steps in order to avoid any controversies during its release. They also requested that the censor board ensure that no copyright infringements occur.
Recall, the film was originally scheduled to release on January 7, but was forced to be delayed due increased Covid-19 cases. As per the film’s director If these numbers continue to rise, then the release of the film was not possible.
While this was happening, the “RRR” movie started trending on social media, with many calling for a boycott of the film in Karnataka because of the Kannada version being given less importance than the Tamil, Telugu and Hindi versions.
The film earned critical acclaim for its direction, cinematography motion sequences, the music, and the script. It received international recognition and was named among the top 10 highest-grossing movies in India.
In February of 2021 Lyca Productions acquired Tamil Nadu rights to theatrical distribution for RRR while Pen Studios took over North Indian rights. The film is scheduled to release on July 30th, 2020.
Hearing venue
Before the film’s release, SS Rajamouli’s magnum opus ‘RRR’ featuring Jr NTR and Ram Charan was upheld in court for the story’s premise based on freedom fighters Alluri Sita Komaram Bheem and Ramaraju. Both were alleged to be deceitful. Alluri Soumya from West Godavari district filed the petition to request that the film’s release be postponed and not issued a censorship certificate.
Alluri Soumya believes that the litigation is of public interest and the court should stop the release of “RRR” because it ruins the history of Alluri Sita Ramaraju as well as Kambaram Bheem. She stated that the story about Alluri Sita Ramaraju was embellished making it untrue; additionally the background of Komaram Bheem was also misrepresented in the film, therefore, she believes the movie should not be released.
Production was handled by DVV Danayya and directed by SS Rajamouli, the film is starring NTR as well as Ram Charan as the lead roles as well as Ajay Devgn, and Alia Bhatt playing the supporting roles. Samuthirakani, Shriya Saran, Ray Stevenson, and Alison Doody additionally appear in other roles.
There have been numerous disagreements over the movie “RRR”, one of the most notable being its promotional that features a character wearing skull caps. Siddipet State President and Karimnagar MP Bandi Sanjay expressed displeasure with the scene and demanded producers to take it out of the film.
The court however has rejected her appeal and ordered that the ‘RRR’ be released. The result is that there will be an CJ hearing before the tribunal in the near future and it will be interesting to observe how this issue is handled.
According to reports that the film will continue shooting on October 22 in Mahabaleshwar. According to the latest information on the shoot 1000 fighters have been selected for the film’s action sequence.
The new schedule for ‘RRR is in the beginning and has already won viewers’ hearts. The reports suggest that the film will be shot in two locations namely Mahabaleshwar in Gujarat and Mahabaleshwar. Gujarat.
Decision
The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that was brought in Telangana High Court by Alluri Sowmya who is a student from the West Godavari district. She argued that the representation of the life of two rebels from RRR is in contradiction to their lives and misrepresents the reality. In her plea she asked an order from the court for censor’s certificate and prohibit the producers from releasing the film.
The petitioner had also expressed displeasure with the depiction of Martyr Alluri Seetharamaraju as police officer, a portrayal that she believed is in contradiction with his character and lifestyle. Furthermore, she believes that the film was damaging Alluri Sita Ramaraju’s image and legacy by portraying her as an ordinary police officer.
SS Rajamouli’s directorial directed by his son, is scheduled for release this year and features Jr NTR, Ram Charan and Alia Bhatt in lead roles. It has however, faced many controversies and was delayed indefinitely due to an increase in cases of the COVID-19 Omicron pandemic.
In the past, Telangana BJP chief Bandi Sanjay Kumar delivered another attack on the film by instructing them not to use any visuals featuring Jr NTR wearing the Muslim skull cap in its trailer.
The BJP believes this will cause a deep political rift amongst tribal communities and people across Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Maharashtra. In addition, The Telangana BJP has threatened to torch down any theatre showing the movie when the film’s protagonist is portrayed as Muslim.
The Telangana High Court has now instructed the filmmakers to bring back the film if it doesn’t harm Alluri Sita Ramaraju and Komaram Bheem’s image. The filmmakers have yet take action on the court’s decision – it will be interesting to hear their response.